Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Subject:Re: size of 87 vs. 91 vanagon
From:David Katsuki
Date:Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:37:16 -0400

At 10:47 PM 9/20/98 -0400, JordanVw@AOL.COM wrote:
>In a message dated 98-09-20 20:35:59 EDT, ltim@BELLSOUTH.NET writes:
>
><< > > << I was intrigued  by Marvin Peitz's note stating that 88-and-later
>GL's were
> > >  at least a foot longer than 87-and-earlier. I've owned almost every
year
> > >  from 86 to 91 and never noticed a difference.  Having an 88 and an
87 in
> > >  the driveway at the moment, both GL's,I dashed out and measured them
>both,
> > >  headlight-to-tailight.  They were exactly the same, 169 inches.
> > >   >>
> > >
> > > but did you know they are taller too???  yes, about 5/8 inch..  its
>because
> > > the thickness of the metal.  the '88 and later GL's are made with good
>metal,
> > > instead of the bad metal that the earlier vans were made of.
> > > personally, i'd stay away from the earlier vans, because of the quality
>of the
> > > metal.

And this is also why the later vans all came with black finished magnesium
folding cupholders to save weight, and as an added bonus, they never break.
  Unfortuately, VW lost $50 on each cupholder they made, and so they are no
longer made.   There is one on display in the Lars Anderson automotive
museum (near Boston), next to the gasoline pills.

Dave

Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »