

| Subject: | Re: Engine Conversion's Done (long) |
| From: | David Marshall |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:57:24 -0700 |
At 00:06 9/23/98 EDT, KENWILFY@AOL.COM wrote: >4. In-line 4 gas conversion >Pros: Good fuel mileage, very reliable power plant, very available motor, >parts are cheap and easy to pick up, VW powerplant again makes servicing not a >problem at the dealer, who is very familiar with this motor. Horsepower is >same or more than waterboxer (depending on which motor you choose- 1.6l, 1.8l, >2.0l). This conversion can be done using a diesel Vanagon and has been done >more than any other conversion. It has proven to be a good and reliable >choice. >Cons: Not as much power as some of the other conversions (Chevy or Subaru), >not as much low end torque as a normal Waterboxer. The 2.0L has more power and more torque than the wasserleaker and it comes on lower in the RPM range too. Another pro is modifications are cheap and plentiful too... -- David Marshall Quesnel BC Canada mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- -- 73 Audi 100LS, 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy -- -- 87 Audi 5KQ, 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 2.0L VW Syncro Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org --
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »