

| Subject: | Re: head electrolysis cure? |
| From: | Robert Williams |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:43:17 -0700 |
Mark, A sacrificial anode needs to be a block of metal electrically connected to the metal you are trying to protect. So I do not think metal disolved in the coolant would do what you want. The anode will end up as a disolved salt in the coolant when it is corroded instead of the metal you are protecting. In essence you are creating a battery with the 2 different metals and the electrolite (Autobahn, etc.) For protection to occur, there must be an electrical connection between the 2 metals. Bob > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:32:38 -0400 > From: Mark Gajewski <mgajewski@MANVILLERUBBER.COM> > Subject: head electrolysis cure? > > Just went for a long drive in my '85 and realized again why we all love > these things...also had lots of time to think... > has anyone ever tried using some sort of sacrificial anode in the water > jacket to reduce/elimate the reduction/oxidation reaction that results > in pitted heads and leads eventually to leaking heads? i.e. electric > hot water heaters last for 10-15 years without rusting/rotting partly > due to the sacrificial magnesium or aluminum anode that is placed in the > tank. The anode gets reduced but not the tank as the magnesium or > aluminum is preferred in the red/ox reaction to the steel tank or tank > lining. Similarly, underground storage tanks are protected by using > large Zinc blocks that are strapped to the tanks. I believe ships use > something similar, or at least the concept is similar. > Perhaps some dissolved zinc in our coolant would work, being preferred > in the red/ox reaction to the aluminum of our heads? Any chemists or > metallurgists out there who could comment on this? I am not certain of > all the details but I believe the concept is correct...although if it is > wouldn't VW have simply added this "anode" material to the Autobahn > coolant to prevent/eliminate the leakage issue and all the irate > wasserleaker owners...have changes been made to the coolant since the > leakage problem arose? I suppose that would make regular coolant > changes absolutely mandatory to insure that the "anode" material has not > been completed consumed by the reaction. > Mark
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »