the windows do look bigger than ours.  the SA website pictures were tough to
tell...in one picture they looked bigger, in the next they looked the same.
how did we get on this subject again?

Michael B. Harrnacker
89 Weekender "Nameles"
91 Golf "Miami"
http://ruralinstitute.umt.edu/vwbus
vanagon@rudi.montech.umt.edu

"Never miss a good chance to shut up."

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sullivan <sullivan@OPENMARKET.COM>
To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM>
Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: parts are parts?

>Actually, go to vanagon.com to see the now-classic picture of the SA
Vanagon (at the bottom of the pix page) -- if you will carefully study the
picture closely you will notice that the windows are MUCH taller than ours
(by about 2") and that the body panels are indeed different - there is no
horizontal "notch" under the windows as in our vans. This makes sense as the
larger windows necessitated eliminating this body feature. The front doors
are also different.
>
>I cannot explain it any better than that. If you still have trouble
"seeing" the difference I suggest you print the picture out on your printer
and then going outside and comparing it to your Vanagon -- you'll see what I
mean.
>
>Cheers,
>MJS
>
>At 05:32 PM 10/11/98 -0600, Michael Harrnacker wrote:
>>Do you have different/better pictures than the ones on the VW SA site?
From
>>the pictures I see, the rear windows ARE different (sliding type, no air
>>vent at the rear), but the windows APPEAR to fit in the same size/shape
body
>>panel opening. The colors on all the pictures are too dark for me to
>>accurately make out individual body panel lines, but it doesn't look to me
>>like the body panels have been changed at all.
>
>
>
>Michael J. Sullivan
>Director of Catalog Design
>Open Market, Inc.
>
>*************************************
>work: http://www.openmarket.com
>play: http://www.hsdesign.com
>*************************************
>