>
>>Yes it's true.  After a couple of weeks of playing with the new carb,
>>jetting, timing, vacume advance, and other related systems, Turd is now
>>running better that she ever has.  The FI to Carb conversion is now done.
>>There were a few issues with the carb tuning (new emulsion tube solved the
>>worst problem) and the fact that the carbs' throttle clip is about 6 inches
>>farther back than the FI was.  The van used to get almost 20mpg with me
>>driving when the FI was in good shape.  Now with the carb I'm getting
>>almost 25mpg (it was close to 30 but was running dangerously lean) all
>>highway driving.

I'm sorry, but I just don't beleive 25 mpg is possible at highway speeds in
a vanagon. Diesels only get a little bit better than that and they're much
more efficient. I think your testing methodology must be flawed.

Joshua Van Tol -- jjvantol@lear.csp.ee.memphis.edu
[text/enriched]

<excerpt>

>Yes it's true.  After a couple of weeks of playing with the new carb,

>jetting, timing, vacume advance, and other related systems, Turd is
now

>running better that she ever has.  The FI to Carb conversion is now
done.

>There were a few issues with the carb tuning (new emulsion tube solved
the

>worst problem) and the fact that the carbs' throttle clip is about 6
inches

>farther back than the FI was.  The van used to get almost 20mpg with
me

>driving when the FI was in good shape.  Now with the carb I'm getting

>almost 25mpg (it was close to 30 but was running dangerously lean)
all

>highway driving.

</excerpt>

I'm sorry, but I just don't beleive 25 mpg is possible at highway
speeds in a vanagon. Diesels only get a little bit better than that and
they're much more efficient. I think your testing methodology must be
flawed.

Joshua Van Tol -- jjvantol@lear.csp.ee.memphis.edu