

| Subject: | Re: Friday Frivolity: "Bus" vs. "Van" |
| From: | David Bogle / Architecture |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 1998 19:07:20 -0500 |
> In a message dated 98-11-20 14:38:31 EST, cp@IX.NETCOM.COM writes: > > << I dislike referring to my '88 Westie as a "van" - I prefer to call it a > "bus". For some reason, "bus" has a better karmic feeling to it. To me, > the word "van" conjures up images of an old Chevy cargo van with a broken > 8-track player, duct tape over the windows and a hostage in the back. > > Definitely a "bus" man, myself. You? > >> IMHO, the Vanagon is a "bus" because it has the engine in the rear and the driver is in front of the front wheels, just like in a Greyhound. I always, at least tried to always, refer to the '72 as a "bus" and enjoyed telling others that it is not a van, but a bus. I can't face losing that simple pleasure, just because some marketing bozo conviced VW to name it a "vanagon" for the American market. -- Regards, David Bogle Brooklyn '87 Vanagon GL Syncro Westfalia '72 Campmobile 2.0L (For Sale: http://www.bway.net/~bogle )
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »