

| Subject: | Re: Friday Frivolity: "Bus" vs. "Van" |
| From: | Art McGinn |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 1998 21:56:53 -0800 |
Having driven a '68 bus for many years, but now an '82 Vanagon, I tend to think of the two separately. The Vanagon is an absolute jewel in many ways, whereas the bus was, well, pretty good. Art -----Original Message----- From: YauMan Chan <YauMan@CCHEM.BERKELEY.EDU> To: vanagon@VANAGON.COM <vanagon@VANAGON.COM> Date: Friday, November 20, 1998 12:40 PM Subject: Re: Friday Frivolity: "Bus" vs. "Van" >You're right.. it's not a van. But "bus" is too closely associated with the old hippie vagons.. > >What with all the water and/or oil leaks.. how about "puddle" as in "Honey, can I take the puddle to work or do you need it for soccer momming!" > >Yau-Man Chan >87 GL > >>>> Chris Paquette <cp@IX.NETCOM.COM> 11/20 11:36 AM >>> >I dislike referring to my '88 Westie as a "van" - I prefer to call it a >"bus". For some reason, "bus" has a better karmic feeling to it. To me, >the word "van" conjures up images of an old Chevy cargo van with a broken >8-track player, duct tape over the windows and a hostage in the back. > >Definitely a "bus" man, myself. You? >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »