>Disadvantages of Syncro:
>Several hundred pounds heavier: slower, more cumbersome handling

Yes, more cumbersome, but I've gotten used to it.

>18MPG vs 20+ for standard Vanagon

Gas is cheap anyway.

>More difficult to shift than 2WD Vanagon

Speaking of shifting, I've been having some trouble shifting my '87
syncro without feeling a little friction going into gear.  Sometimes
it's fine and smooth; it goes from one gear to the next without any
noise or the feeling that I'm rubbing against metal.  But sometimes,
more than usual, it's a little rough.  Anyone know what I mean?

Am I shifting too slowly?  Too quickly?  Wrong RPMs?  Is this normal?

>Weird gas tank;  Very difficult to get full.  Doesn't vent very well.

I noticed this one when I drove away from the pump thinking I must have
gotten a good deal on a tank of gas, then looking down to see it was
only 3/4 full!

Anyway, I would go with the syncro if you really think you'll use it.
I've only had mine a month so I can't say much.  But if I was just using
my vehicle to get around town and travel around when the weather's nice,
I'd get a vanagon.  Hey, if you live in areas with lots of snow, the
city/county usually takes care of that problem for you.  Since obviously
not everyone owns/can afford a four wheel drive, nor do they all own
front wheel drives.

I live in Spokane, WA, where they get lots of snow (it's supposed to be
4-6" tonight).  I see lots of vanagons (non-syncro) around.  They
usually plow the main roads pretty well around here.  Most of my college
friends can't even afford snow tires-but they manage to get around.

Hope it helps--

Jarod Bishop
'86 syncro gl

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com