

| Subject: | Re: Webber conversion input |
| From: | Malcolm Stebbins |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jan 1999 17:27:55 +0000 |
I am sure that Ken and I agree. FI is 'better', but carbs do! work, beats junking a 91Syncro Westy. Thanks for the kind words. Malcolm S KENWILFY@AOL.COM wrote: > Just wanted to say that Malcolm is a really nice guy and we talked before > about his carb setup on the phone last year. It seems that his setup is > doing well for him, but he had an engine fire tottally trash his FI setup > so the carb thing was not just to get rid of the FI. As an Aircraft Mech, > we deal with both carburation and Fuel Injection (alot of the stuff flying > out there still has carbs). I still say that carbs are more touchy, less > efficient, more complicated, and although Malcolm is doing well with his > setup I really can't recommend others try the same. I am almost postive > that it will not pass emissions here in the US (which is really why US > automakers finally went to Fuel Injection on all thier cars in the late > '80s when Foreign cars (except for some real cheapies) had been using it > since the late 70s). So my advice is get to know your FI system, become > friends. Most of the "problems" that we experience here on the list with > the FI could be either quickly remedied or avoided altogether if we just > knew how the system worked and developed proper troubleshooting skills. > Disclaimer: This is not a flame. It is OK to disagree with me (sometimes > I do). Ken Wilford Van-Again John 3:16
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »