

| Subject: | Rod journal size for a 2.0l? |
| From: | Tom Young |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:01:03 -0800 |
Hi all:
I've been slowly, slowly working on the rebuild of two 2-liter
Vanagon engines. I recently got a set of outside micrometers and,
never having used micrometers before, I thought I'd practice by
measuring the diameter of a connecting rod journal on one of the
cranks on my bench. I got a measurement (more or less) of 1.968
inches. So, I looked up the "correct" measurement in my various
manuals and here's what I found:
Clymer's "VW Vanagon 1980-1982 Shop Manual":
2.1644-2.1653 inches (54.95-55.00mm)
Haynes' "VW Air-Cooled Vanagon 1980-1983 Owners Workshop Manual"
54.95 to 55.00mm
Tom Wilson's "How to Rebuild Your Volkswagen Air-Cooled Engine"
2.1648-2.1654 inches (54.98-55.00mm) (1700/1800 engines)
1.9677-1.9687 inches (49.97-49.98mm) (2000 engines)
Bentley's "Official Factory Repair Manual"
Not listed
So here's my questions:
1) Who's got it right in the above list, and why the hell would an
"Official Factory Repair Manual" (Bentley) not list such a vital
dimension? (Or, maybe it does, and I just can't find it?)
2) If "majority rules" and the proper dimension is around 2.165
inches, does it make any sense that I'm measuring a much smaller
diameter? Ignoring "operator error", (I'll go back tomorrow and re-
measure this), is it possible that Tom Wilson's book has the
dimensions backward, and I have a 1700/1800 crank in my 2000 engine?
This engine was rebuilt by VW of Canada, has a "CV" code, and the rod
bearings are marked "STD".
Thanks for any help.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Young young@sherlock.SIMS.Berkeley.EDU
Lafayette, CA 94549 '81 Vanagon
---------------------------------------------------------------------Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »