

| Subject: | Re: Audi Shmaudi lets talk Volvo |
| From: | Dave Rodriguez |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:43:04 EST |
Personally, I wouldn't mind a Volvo B21FT(Turbo). But if I had any choice, it would be a 2.3T from an Audi 5000. But from what I understand, a 16v will fit in the vans... -Dave '88 GTi 16v (Screaming for a 2-liter bottom end) '88 Vanagon GL Wolfsburg (screaming for SOMETHING) In a message dated 1/15/99 7:02:58 PM, rennkafer@connectcorp.net wrote: >Reliable they may be... but I know one of the reasons that people replace >the engines with the Audi is to increase the horsepower (since the engine is >shot you may as well.. :) The '78 244 Volvo I worked on had a B21 in it I >believe and was only rated at 99 hp if memory serves correct... the Audis >are just as reliable from what I can see and the lower hp unit (2.1) is 115 >hp... the 2.3 is 130... if I had the choice I know which I'd pick... > >Bill Johnson >'85 GL Westy >'97 VFR750 >'67 Bug
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »