

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Reliability-final comment? |
| From: | Phillip Bouton |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:30:31 -0500 |
How can you get reliability out of a ten year old vehicle? There are no guarantees. Problems with vanagon are not that different from other ten year old vehicles, only on the vanagon list 80% of what is talked about is how to fix problems. So that is mostly what we hear and see and expect. How reliable is a ten year old Toyota? If you want a reliability (i.e., expect to not have to keep replacing worn parts or rebuild the engine once every 100k or so), then just don't buy a ten year old vehicle, no matter what make it is. -Phillip -----Original Message----- From: JordanVw@AOL.COM [mailto:JordanVw@AOL.COM] Sent: Friday, January 15, 1999 6:51 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Vanagon Reliability In a message dated 99-01-14 08:47:52 EST, Kevin_T._Justice@DADEBEHRING.COM writes: << I am again interesting in purchasing a Vanagon, preferably a Syncro, (also considering the merits of a Double Cab). <Aside: Lynnda, glad to see you sold your Syncro, sorry about dragging my feet.> I am very much interested in obtaining one of these vehicles but was recently set back in my quest by the response given by another listmember to my question regarding reliability. A brief exerpt of our e-conversation follows: Q: > What kind > of reliability might I expect from a vehicle like [this one]? >> why do think all we do is talk about engine swaps on this list? to be honest...the vanagon isnt in a class of "reliable vehicles". you want reliability, drive a japanese car....but the jap cars have no class...no "panache"... :<) i have a vanagon, because i like vw's, it has a neat interior layout, and it's a versatile vehicle. it's just too bad they have sucky motors.... chris [text/html]
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »