

| Subject: | Re: Water in Oxy sensor. |
| From: | Karl Batzler |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:03:27 -0800 |
I don't think that it's a very good idea to "seal" the oxy sensor. I believe that it needs to "breathe" to sense ambient oxygen content or it may not work properly. JMHO Karl Batzler 84 Vanagon 87 Audi 5000 S La Quinta, CA -----Original Message----- From: Nathaniel Merrill <nmerrill@PARAMETRIX.COM> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Date: Thursday, January 28, 1999 8:55 AM Subject: Water in Oxy sensor. If any of you read my last post on Digitool readings and oxy sensors a few days ago you would have noticed that the conclusion was that the oxy sensor I had was shorting internally and Voltage from the heater was corrupting the signal to the ECU. I was reading several volts at the Ecu (through the Digitool) on several occasions. This was a intermittent problem which disabled the van- USUALLY associated with rain (and I live in Seattle). I replaced the sensor yesterday with the "F**D" connector oxy sensor (U.S. part # 13913). Van runs great and all readings are normal. So I decided to look into the old one to see what I could find. I ripped the "top" off the sensor where the wires exit and found WATER inside the metal cap and the rubber plug--- around the connectors for the three wires. Also It looks like there may have been water in the main body of the sensor. So now I am wondering if there may be differences between oxy sensors? Is it possible that some sensors are more suitable for exposed mounting like on the vanagon? The old sensor I opened was also a 13913 F**D sensor with only 10-11K on it. Anyway I intend to seal my new one well with oxy sensor safe rtv silicone.! Nat Seattle
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »