Kent Christensen wrote:
>
> ... and DAVID-M is COMPLETELY WRONG if the photograph is of
> a person, because the photographer nees a model release to
> publish it, and until the photographer has that s/he or
> his/her employer owns little..
>
No, I'm not wrong. The photographer still owns the copyright, regardless
of a model release. Right to publication is a completely separate issue
which I never mentioned.