

| Subject: | Re: Connecting rod questions |
| From: | Joshua Van Tol |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Feb 1999 21:55:42 -0600 |
> On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Joseph Fournier wrote: > >> Your manual, Clymer's has been reputed to have some errors. I've >> always found it a good second-best to Bentley and Wilson for the early >> bays, but the cross-referencing, I think, is a good idea. You will find >> five different specifications for some things if you check five >> different manuals. > > How well I know!!! I've got the Clymer, Bentley, Haynes and Wilson books > and spend half my time trying to reconcile them!! > > Wilson, so far, has been the most accurate but it's sometimes difficult > to pick out the comments about my engine(s) from all the rest of the > chatter. In many ways the Bentley is the most disapointing since it's > not had some very "fundamental" information I've needed, e.g., crank > journal diameters. By gum, you're right. It has those dimensions for the Waterboxer though. The book for the late bus also has this info. I wonder what happened to it? A few pages lost? Joshua Van Tol -- jjvantol@uswest.net
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »