

| Subject: | Re: V@lkswagen Vanag@n vs Volkswagen Vanagon vs VWoA |
| From: | Ari Ollikainen |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:20:18 -0800 |
At 10:44 PM 2/21/99, Keith Olsen wrote:
>V@lkswagen Vanag@n vs Volkswagen Vanagon
>I've seen a problem like this before in other areas and people just had to get
>creative in their usage. It's done all the time.
>BTW: Look at food products that call themselves "lite" They have no set
>standard that they need to adhere to. "Lite" is not a real word so they can
>assign any meaning they want to it. And if the public happens to mistake it
>for "light" meaning less in calories or fat or cholesterol...too bad.
>or, I've seen a product called Just Pik't orange juice. Now, they couldn't
>call it "Just Picked" because it wasn't picked recently enough to justify a
>"Just" . But "Just Pik't" sounds like "just picked" when you say it but the
>speaker of the phrase has legal safety net so you've gotten across the concept
>of freshness, without leagally having to substantiate it. Ain't this country
>great! D*MN Right it is.
>I'd double check this loophole with an expert before proceeding, because while
>I fancy myself a wiseass and a gadfly, I ain't no lawyer.
Nor, apparently, a network domain addressing expert...:-)
V@lkswagen Vanag@n NOR any other combination using the "@"
(circumflex) character won't work for a domain name nor mailinglist
name since the meaning of the "@" is fixed...
OLTECO Ari Ollikainen
P.O. BOX 3688 Networking Technology and Architecture
Stanford, CA Ari@OLTECO.com
94309-3688 415.517.3519Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »