

| Subject: | Re: tire ratings explained |
| From: | Roger&Zoe Ann Banker |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:27:52 EST |
In a message dated 2/28/99 12:57:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, pdooley@GTE.NET writes: Hi. I'm no expert, but I've picked up some info over the years. For passenger car tires (those that begin with "P"), go by the ratings on the sidewall. "A" is best, and higher is better for the number used for the mileage rating. For truck tires (those that say "LT", not "P"), see my answers below: > Can a tire's sidewall strength be rated by the number of plies? The ply rating by itself was the old way to rate strength. If all plies are created equal, then just adding plies means more strength. But all plies aren't equal, so go by the load rating. "C" is the bottom, then "D", etc. "C" used to be always 6 ply, and "D" 8 ply, so "D" still equals an 8 ply rating in tire shop jargon, even though the actual number of plies may be less. > Is there a standard individual ply strength? No, the plies differ, that is why the "C" or "D" type rating is used. The sidewall will show the load that the tire can carry. Use the single rating for the Vanagon, not the dual. > What if you had a tire with 10 ultra puny plies? Then you would have a relatively weak tire. > Then my 6 beefy ply tire could actually be tougher. A tire with 6 thicker plies could actually be as strong as a tire with 8 thinner plies, and run cooler. The more plies there are, the more friction and heat with flexing. > Anybody know for sure? Just read those sidewall ratings closely. There are lots of passenger car tires with aggressive tread designs and truck-like names, but the giveaway is the "P" for passenger in the description. And truck tires use the actual total height and width measurements in inches (I use 27 x 8 1/2 x 14, "C" rated). Normally "C" rated LT tires are adequate for the Vanagon, and "D" ratings are rare for tires small enough to fit. Passenger car tires use a sidewall millimeter height, and a percentage of sidewall height for the width (235mm x 70% x 14inch). Roger
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »