Not sure if this is related but I have used Fram filters ever since I can
remember. No real preference; Fram is usually what is handiest and I had no
reason NOT to use them. Anyhow, I had occasion to change the oil pressure
sensor a couple of months back. When I installed the new sensor the oil
light indicated low pressure. Back went the sensor for another one. I
installed the second new one; same thing, an oil light. TWO IN A ROW!?!?! Oh
well, back again for another one. The third new sensor did the trick.
   Up until I read these blurbs about Fram filters I just thought I ran into
some bad luck; NOW though I am not so sure. Could be there is nothing wrong
with the Fram filters but I am not inclined to bet my engine on it against
the possibility of saving a few bucks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf
Of jack
Sent: Sun, February 28, 1999 10:47 AM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject:

Peter, Thanks for your reply.

I do not pretend to be an oil filter engineer so I can't answer why Fram
works for you.  But I got the solution to my problem, off this list, from
other Vanagon, Waterboxer owners who had problems with Fram oil filters.

Imho, the factory filter provides better oil flow when the engine is
running and has a feature that provides a back flow check when the engine
is stopped. I now can leave the van parked for weeks and, on start up, have
no valve lifter noise.

Perhaps your engine is a little less tired than mine, and can get by with a
less efficient oil lube system.  But based on my experience, and that of
others on this list  (read the back posts)  Fram is not the way to go.   Is
it worth $3 or $4 bucks an oil change to risk less than optimum engine
lube.   For me the answer is no.

Jack A2
84 GL
91 Festiva