

| Subject: | Re: Waterboxer hop-up vs. swap |
| From: | davidb |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:19:28 -0800 |
Eric: Extensive discussions were discussed here about a year ago. Look through the archives to see if you can find them. davidb Eric Pickering wrote: > Has anyone done a comparison of pros and cons for an engine swap versus > a nicely modified waterboxer? Looking at things like ratio rockers, > chip work, flowed heads (and polished), maybe bigger valves, camshaft, > perf. exhaust, better intake, even lighter connecting rods for higer > RPMs and lest fatique, etc. It might be cheaper and/or easier to just > make a bad-ass waterboxer engine than spend the time money and headache > on a swap. I know head mods along with some of the others can make a BIG > HP and torque difference. I certainly want to explore it before I do a > swap. > > Eric Pickering > > Eric Pickering
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »