

| Subject: | Re: a shocking question |
| From: | Rubatoguy |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:00:26 -0700 |
I have KYBs. The KYBs canted the Westy because only the rear are gas. The ride is harsher, and I find that the gas in the rear, and non-gas in the front is not to my liking. They did cure the weeble ride - but not to the extent that the Michelin MXTs did. My next shocks will be Blistiens. Todd '88 westy Jim Fritz wrote: > Volks, > OK, My 89 Westy got new shoes (Michelin MXTs) but it still dips and rolls like a punch drunk heavy weight boxer. To the point that my wife starts getting car sick in the back seat (our 7 year old always beats her to the front seat). Anyway, I've already read many of the comments that have been given over the list about the Westy ride i.e. its a top heavy vehicle, you need to get use to the "bus ride", etc. etc., but with 60,000 miles and the orignal VW shocks I can't help but think I could do a little better with new ones. > Many folks have extolled the virtues of the KYBs (they're economical), the Bilsteins (they're definitely more expensive and don't come with a warantee...why would you want to trust them?), and the Konis (the grand puba of shocks with a price to match. The adjustability is desireable but the price is a killer). > > I know that my Passat has spoiled me but the wife says I gotta do something about this and she doesn't care about the cost if it'll stop her nausea. So, THE QUESTIONS: > Why did you choose the shocks you bought? What's good/bad about the shocks you bought? What shocks do you think would be the best for a "ride on rails" feel rather the "Weeble people" ride I have now? Where could I get the best price on a set of Konis and what is the right model number (I have all this info for KYBs and Bilsteins already.) > > Thanks to all! > Jim in Iowa > 91 Passat Wagon GL > 89 Westy > 66 Beetle
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »