

| Subject: | Re: Quality of Quality of Work, NO VANAGON CONTENT |
| From: | Karl Wolz |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 1999 16:41:40 -0700 |
Which has yet to return a penny and has done God only knows what to our ozone layer. Karl Wolz ----- Original Message ----- From: David..M <dmc@CYBURBAN.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 12:14 PM Subject: Re: Quality of Quality of Work, NO VANAGON CONTENT > Bulley wrote: > > > > Bulley Babble (thanks to speech-recognition software, while I eat my > > lunch), on a subject near and dear to my heart: QUALITY. > > > > We are living in a unique time. Not long ago, let's say, during the early > > '70s, country of origin and long-term familiarity with the manufacturing > > company were clear indicators of the level of quality you would receive > > upon purchase. > > > > Company names like Westinghouse, General Motors, or Foster Grant spoke of > > their quality, and were part of their "competitive advantage". Where are > > these top brands of the early '70's now? > > > > It was likewise for country of origin. For example, we all accepted on > > face value that Americans made a fantastic large luxury car. The Japanese > > made a fantastic small economy car. The Germans built well-engineered > > auto-cross quality sports cars. The French made...well, the French have > > always made great breads. > > > > > What? No mention of the British, and a disparaging comment about the > French. > They did build the Concorde between them, which the Americans tried > their best to ban from landing on its shores. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »