

| Subject: | Re: screwed part deux..the insurance company's offer??./salvagecert.??? |
| From: | William Cooper |
| Date: | Thu, 13 May 1999 14:10:04 -0400 |
With all due respect "Wrong?" I'm an Agent myself and I say what I say out of experience. I don't claim to speak for everyone, least of all California (for years an insurance nightmare) but I do speak for myself and the fine companies I represent (companies I choose based on their history, financial stability etc.) And what I said earlier stands, based if only on my own business experience. I could fight all sorts of battles based on California and all its messed up laws etc. Anyway, I'm enjoying the discussion. Thanks Bill -----Original Message----- From: Steven X. Schwenk <Steve@Schwenk-Law.com> To: William Cooper <william_c_cooper@EMAIL.MSN.COM> Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Date: Thursday, May 13, 1999 10:34 AM Subject: Re: screwed part deux..the insurance company's offer??./salvagecert.??? >This topic is appropriate because it concerns saving money on your vanagon but >not aqllowing the ins. co. to rip you off. A lot of people have to go through >thios ordeal and knowing what to do and expect can save a lot of frustration and >$$. > >With respect to your other point, you are wrong. According to a major study >just released about two months ago, Insurance companies are keeping a higher and >higher percentage of auto ins. premiums and are paying out less and less in >damage claims than in years past. In california, profits on auto policies have >quadrupled in recent years because the companies thumb their noses at >third-party claimants and do not pay the losses caused by their insureds unless >they are hauled into court. If they did the same thing to their policy holders, >they would incur bad faith liability, but there is no longer any third party bad >faith in california, so they have nothing to lose... only profits to gain. > >William Cooper wrote: > >> On another note, could we please drop the whole "screwed by insurance >> company" thing. I appreciate that there are jerks in every industry, but if >> the same company paid out $300,000 to $500,000 on your behalf because you >> ran over some kid, your couple thousand a year in premium would seem a >> bargain. Trust me, I've seen companies pay claims they had no business >> paying (big ones). One thing I know helps (this is the shameless self >> promotion part) is having an agent run some interference. Companies dealing >> directly with insureds have a much easier time denying claims than when they >> have to explain that denial to there Agent. >> I know, I know------SHAMELESS!!!!! >> >> Bill Cooper >> '91 200 t >> -----Original Message----- >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »