

| Subject: | Re: Gerry is ill - suggestions for a server upgrade |
| From: | EMZ |
| Date: | Fri, 21 May 1999 20:27:54 -0400 |
After checking this out with some high power NT people, in hte
co. I work, you are 100% correct!
Eric 86-VW4x4
vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z
Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Tonya Pope wrote:
> Throwing hardware at a software problem won't fix much, only increase
> the time between crashes slightly. The server you're proposing is
> overkill capable of handling a great deal more (which is an
> understatement) than we'd ever need. And I REALLY don't think the list
> would be too happy to have spent that much money only to still have it
> crash (which it would if not properly configured).
>
> Not sure what our maillist software's preference is, but if it's similar
> to the software we have on our NT then Gerry's virtual swap is set too
> high, both min and max should 128 if there's 64 mb of real memory,
> evenly distributed across partitions if there is more than 1 partition
> on the harddrive. While NT apps are known for memory leaks, most can be
> reduced if not eliminated if configured properly. The maillist
> software's site could possibly have technical specs as to what NT
> settings are most favorable to it. While having a backup drive would be
> nice, we've put up with hardware related downtimes before and harddrives
> are fairly reliable so I don't think it's a real issue unless there's
> spare cash available.
>
> Tonya
> 87 Vanagon GL Wolfs
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »