

| Subject: | Re: Gas versis catalytic converter |
| From: | Fred Porter |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:56:25 -0600 |
Tyrone, there are more reasons than bureaucracy to have a catalytic converter, namely pollution reduction. Besides, wouldn't it make more sense for William to fix the problem that is causing the cats to deteriorate? This may be a problem that leads to other problems. $60 saved by not using a cat isn't going to pay for repair of an engine problem that has gotten worse. later, Fred Tyrone L. Greene wrote: > William, > > I have no idea where in the world or the US you are but, if your in an area > that is not so tightly controlled by so called air standards that require you > to have a Cat. and to have a probe inserted within your Vanagon's rear end > every year, you might consider getting a Cat. replacer pipe. The pipe is > flanged just like the Cat. Only thing is is that you need to drill it and > somehow mount a OX sensor on it. This item can be bought from at least one of > the List's vendors that I know of for less than $30 compared to the $99+ for a > new Cat. You should be able to see a little bit aof an increase in both usable > hp and gas mileage, I would think. > > Tyrone > Big Pine Key, FL > > 87 GL Syncro > 85 Westy > etc.... > > Greenamyer, William L wrote: > > > I have a 1984 Vanagon Waterboxer that seems to be eating catalytic > > converters in less than a year. I have been told several different stories > > about what could be the problem. Injector pattern not right, wrong mix, > > air-fuel ratio wrong, etc but most of this should manifest itself in some > > other symptom. The latest from a mechanic is that I should be using premium > > gas in the van (octane 92) rather than octane 87. I am just at a loss right > > now. The van gets 20MPG which includes some distance going up a 6 degree > > grade with the air conditioning on and the still being able to acclerate on > > the freeway going 70 MPH. The 1900 engine has been replaced with a 2100 > > (two years and many miles ago). I am looking for inputs as to what could be > > the real problem. Also, at idle, the engine seeks a lot of the time. By > > that I mean it revs up a little and then settles back down to normal. > > > > William
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »