

| Subject: | Re: Tail lights? |
| From: | John |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:13:28 -0400 |
dave wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've noticed that Vanagons are exempt of the third rear brake light, that
> became mandatory for many vehicles in 1987.
>
> Any idea how or why Vanagons are not required to have this?
>
> my best thoughts are....
>
> - because the Vanagon is an import
> - maybe has to do with it's size or shape
> - some how it is exempt...
>
> (all lame reasons, tho I cannot think of why they are not required to
> have one).
>
> Any ideas or feedback would be great...
>
> Thanks much,
>
> dave bowers
> portland, oregon
>
> 1991 Vanagon GL, 46k
Dave,
I think the Vanagon is considered to be a light truck and is exemept. I
installed on from JCW.
JPHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »