

| Subject: | Re: Tail lights? |
| From: | EMZ |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 1999 22:09:33 -0400 |
It was not Mandatory until 1991.
Eric 86-VW4x4
vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z
Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, dave wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've noticed that Vanagons are exempt of the third rear brake light, that
> became mandatory for many vehicles in 1987.
>
> Any idea how or why Vanagons are not required to have this?
>
> my best thoughts are....
>
> - because the Vanagon is an import
> - maybe has to do with it's size or shape
> - some how it is exempt...
>
> (all lame reasons, tho I cannot think of why they are not required to
> have one).
>
>
> Any ideas or feedback would be great...
>
> Thanks much,
>
> dave bowers
> portland, oregon
>
> 1991 Vanagon GL, 46k
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »