| Subject: | Re: Rear shocks/springs question |
| From: | Per Lindgren |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:27:13 +0100 |
Connal Hughes wrote: > I thought the back end was intentionally sat lower than the front, at least > to some degree. It is, but it is only 40' (that's minutes, not feet) PerL 87 Syncro 112i
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »