

| Subject: | Re: Putting a water cooled engine in an 82?!? |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:59:00 EST |
In a message dated 12/1/99 10:14:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
waxi@MAILANDNEWS.COM writes:
<<
Air-cooled Vs. Water-cooled
- Engines cheaper not as cheap as
air-cooled
- Radiators free not as cheap
as air-cooled
- All those radiator hoses free not as cheap as
air-cooled
- $ spent on fluids like
coolant (not oil) cheaper not as cheap as
air-cooled
- $ spent on gas equal equal (lucky for
you guys)
- $ spent on oil expensive cheaper
(Hey oil is cheap)
- All the parts that are
common to all vanagons equal equal (again lucky for
you guys)
>>
My additions:
Horsepower and Torque: Less Power More Power
Environmental: More Emmissions Less Emmissions
Time between rebuilds: 100-120k miles 170-200k miles
Probability of dropping
a valve on overheating: High Very Low
Heat in the winter: Poor Very Good
A/C in summer: None- Poor Good
Just pointing out a few other things. Not slamming folks who drive Aircooled
VWs (I am getting my '74 Bus ready for the road), just pointing out why I
like watercooled vans more. I love heat and A/C. Wind in my face gets
annoying at 65 or 70 mph :)
Different strokes for different folks. Maybe I'll become more enlightened
after I drive my groovy Bus for a while :)
Thanks,
Ken Wilford
http://www.vanagain.com
John 3:16
Office (856)-765-1583
Shop (856)-327-0027
Fax (856)-327-2242Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »