

| Subject: | Re: MUCH more than we needed to know |
| From: | Dadeeo |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:28:35 -0500 |
Mike Miller wrote: > The message below was embedded three deep in attachment land. After going > to the incredible trouble of opening all those levels and reading it, I > wished I hadn't. Not here, it was right there, "on top", no opening of any type required. Check your settings. > > > Lessons learned from this: > > 1. Don't embed messages. Put them right out front. > Didn't apply to me, but still a good rule. > > 2. Never read anything that quotes Car & Driver [should have know that > since I've read the original since it was Sports Car Graphic] no comment... > > > 3. Be really careful reading anything from someone named Carol Sussman. Ouch, I don't know Carol but she seems to have a good sense of humor at the least... > > > 4. Under no circumstances try anything she suggests. experimentation is the key to new and/or better idea's. > > > 5. Wake up before you respond to any messages on the list. Another DNA, but still it's a good rule to. > > > Mike > '85 Westy [Just one more cup of coffee and I'll be fine] Implies that you weren't... :-) Terry > > > In Car & Driver magazine some years back one of the columnists recounted his > (unsuccessful) attempt to discreetly relieve himself by utilizing a > technigue > premised on the applicability of the venturi effect to liquid released near > the airstream created by a slightly opened driver's door. I don't remember > the details (didn't take notes since this requires hardware not specific to > my gender) but apparently a speed of at least 65mph was a crucial component > for successful expulsion of fluid from the vehicle. > I'm sure it could work for most of this group--- any empiricists out > there?! > Carol Sussman
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »