

| Subject: | Re: metric vs. English |
| From: | Austin |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:25:00 -0800 |
At 08:59 PM 12/15/1999 -0500, you wrote: >At 19:03 12/14/99 , t obrien wrote: >>>The silliest thing of all is that the US still does not use metric. >>Excusse meee.... >>We do use metric... > >It's been pointed out that .001 inch is about the limit of machining >accuracy, and .0001 inch is about the limit of grinding accuracy -- this >makes inches a very convenient unit in the machinist's world. Millimeters >are much less convenient in this instance. > >David Beierl - Providence, RI Most CNC machine tools are built as metric machines, w/ inches & required algorithms thrown into the software, & the smallest increment that is programmable is .0001 inches (one tenth of one thousandth of an inch): however the machines will accept .001 mm as a metric least increment, which works out to ~.00004 inches, or 4 tenths of 1 tenth of a thousandth of an inch!! i.e., in metric mode the tools are more than twice as accurate! FWIW: a human hair measures ~.003" in diameter - 3 one-thousandths of an inch. There exists a penultimate unit of measure that made it's way down from NACA in the old days known as RCH - ostensibly the finest unit of measure ever detected, but which I can't divulge in a public/family forum (let yer polluted imaginations run wild, & the context is that in the old Apollo days it was definitely a man's world, that going into space business!). Austin
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »