

| Subject: | Re: More counter-intuition re traction (some token VW content) |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Dec 1999 21:48:46 -0800 |
I thought California had a lock on dumb laws. But I guess since we lost our status as having the dumbest choice of Governors we couldn't expect to keep the law title either. Mike '85 Westy ['just because we have the document is not proof we received it' CA DMV] ----- Original Message ----- From: Susan Bernavich <susanb@WIZZARDS.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 1999 6:44 PM Subject: Re: More counter-intuition re traction (some token VW content) > I believe thats the new law here in Oregon also. > Susan Bernavich > 83 diesel 'Harold' > > "John P. Flaherty" wrote: > > > Interesting addition to this thread. Here in Maine, a new law took effect > > this winter. It requires that front wheel drive cars which use studded snow > > tires must use them on all four wheels. Rear wheel drive's still just need > > them on the back wheels. Any other states with similar laws? > > > > John Flaherty > > Standish, ME > > '84 GL > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dominique Cormann <kozmik@HOME.COM> > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > Date: Sunday, December 26, 1999 2:57 AM > > Subject: Re: More counter-intuition re traction (some token VW content) > > > > >On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 01:40:08 -0500 > > >Judith Barr/Leo Girard <lgirard@BMTS.COM> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> I have been interested in the discussion re tire width & traction. It > > >> reminded me of another counter-intuitive statement I read about two years > > >> ago re snow tires on front wheel drive vehicles. > > >> This was attributed to a race car driver of some repute (I forget the > > name > > >> at the moment). He said if you were to put TWO snows on a front wheel > > drive > > >> vehicle they should go on the BACK. Make sense to anyone? > > > > > >I've heard this. If you put them on the front, the front gets to much > > >traction and the rear end flys around oversteering easily. > > > > > >People who would rather understeer then oversteer tend to want to put > > >them on the rear. > > > > > >Personally I would rather be able to steer, and I'll deal with the > > >oversteer, so I'd put them on the front. > > > > > >IMHO there isn't a right way to do this, it just depends on which you > > >dislike more. over or understeer. > > > > > >-- > > >============================================================--------- > > >Dominique Cormann Email: kozmik@home.com > > >Homepage: http://kozmik.guelph.on.ca > > >Diesel page: http://kozmik.guelph.on.ca/gtdproject > > >84 Rabbit D - daily driver 84 Rabbit GTD - work'in on it > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »